From: Regional energy demand in Japan: dynamic shift-share analysis
 | Rate of change in energy demand (%) | National effect | Compositional effect | Regional effect |
---|---|---|---|---|
 | (i) + (ii) + (iii) | (i) | (ii) | (iii) |
Hokkaido | 0.50 | 0.28 | 0.29 | −0.07 |
Aomori | 0.62 | 0.28 | 0.13 | 0.21 |
Iwate | 0.47 | 0.28 | 0.24 | −0.05 |
Miyagi | 1.06 | 0.28 | 0.38 | 0.40 |
Akita | 0.97 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.29 |
Yamagata | 0.63 | 0.28 | 0.50 | −0.15 |
Fukushima | 0.58 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.02 |
Ibaraki | 0.82 | 0.28 | −0.28 | 0.83 |
Tochigi | 0.82 | 0.28 | 0.16 | 0.38 |
Gunma | 0.47 | 0.28 | 0.20 | −0.02 |
Saitama | 0.80 | 0.28 | 0.46 | 0.05 |
Chiba | 0.05 | 0.28 | −0.45 | 0.22 |
Tokyo | 0.55 | 0.28 | 0.89 | −0.62 |
Kanagawa | 0.55 | 0.28 | −0.07 | 0.33 |
Niigata | 0.42 | 0.28 | 0.16 | −0.02 |
Toyama | −0.18 | 0.28 | 0.00 | −0.46 |
Ishikawa | 0.71 | 0.28 | 0.53 | −0.10 |
Fukui | 0.63 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.01 |
Yamanashi | 0.92 | 0.28 | 0.49 | 0.15 |
Nagano | 0.50 | 0.28 | 0.40 | −0.18 |
Gifu | 0.57 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.04 |
Shizuoka | −0.20 | 0.28 | 0.03 | −0.52 |
Aichi | 0.16 | 0.28 | −0.01 | −0.12 |
Mie | −0.35 | 0.28 | −0.42 | −0.21 |
Shiga | 0.34 | 0.28 | −0.04 | 0.09 |
Kyoto | 0.66 | 0.28 | 0.56 | −0.18 |
Osaka | −0.25 | 0.28 | 0.29 | −0.83 |
Hyogo | 0.13 | 0.28 | −0.19 | 0.03 |
Nara | 1.06 | 0.28 | 0.60 | 0.18 |
Wakayama | −0.30 | 0.28 | −0.37 | −0.21 |
Tottori | 1.57 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 1.05 |
Shimane | 0.57 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.00 |
Okayama | −0.06 | 0.28 | −0.60 | 0.25 |
Hiroshima | −0.04 | 0.28 | −0.24 | −0.09 |
Yamaguchi | 0.87 | 0.28 | −0.53 | 1.12 |
Tokushima | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.06 | −0.11 |
Kagawa | 0.15 | 0.28 | −0.05 | −0.08 |
Ehime | 0.69 | 0.28 | −0.22 | 0.63 |
Kochi | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.10 | −0.02 |
Fukuoka | −0.11 | 0.28 | 0.04 | −0.43 |
Saga | 1.43 | 0.28 | 0.38 | 0.77 |
Nagasaki | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.42 | −0.26 |
Kumamoto | 1.25 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.63 |
Oita | 0.24 | 0.28 | −0.61 | 0.57 |
Miyazaki | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.04 | −0.14 |
Kagoshima | 1.12 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.48 |
Okinawa | 1.22 | 0.28 | 0.60 | 0.34 |